Most people complain that they don't have time to read. When do you read?

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Ashfall Review: Final Exam



                Ashfall by Mike Mullin is his first published novel. Most would have low expectations for a rookie’s book, but Mullin has either really good beginner’s luck, or he’s a good writer. It’s the latter for a number of reasons.
            The story is set in the rather dull state of Iowa, and starts off with a 16 year old boy named Alex. His parents and sister are gone for the weekend, visiting his aunt and uncle in Warren, Illinois. Within the first few pages, Mullin moves the story right along with a rock crashing through Alex’s roof and eventually burning his house down. He gets out in time but is met with an intense ashfall. He coughs and hacks and makes his way into his neighbor’s house. There they sleep for a few days uncomfortably in the bathroom. Then, robbers break into the house to scavenge resources. Alex uses his kung-fu skills (more on that later) to get one of them, but then one of the people he’s living with grabs a gun and blows the robbers’ brains out. Then Alex gets out of there and looks for some other place to live.
            He marches through the ash and makes his way to his school, where lots of kids are being housed. He meets his friends and one tells him they are leaving on a bus. He gets to her church only to find that they are sitting there waiting for God to take them. So Alex leaves that bad situation and goes to his dojo where he trains and steals the master’s quarter staff. He then goes back to his house, gets his dad’s skis, packs some food, and heads off to Warren, Illinois.
            On the way there he experiences many challenges. A crazy man named Target (due to the target tattoo on his bald head, a government camp that attempts to save people but doesn’t, and what apocalypse could be complete without a few cannibals? Alex must also deal with something he hasn’t had much experience in, and that’s a girl that he meets on his travels.
            Mullin does a superior job in developing all the major characters in the novel, but what he excels in is giving his characters a unique background and also bizarre quirks that normally would not be found in most dystopian fiction. For example, Alex trains at a dojo for tai-kwon-do. He also is an avid WoW player. He has a rather shy personality as well. Mullin also does a good job of incorporating these quirks into later events in the story. He does this throughout the book and brings each of his characters to life.
            The writing in this book is not high strung and snobby, but it is detailed. Mullin leaves nothing to the imagination when it comes to stabbing a guy in the eye with a staff. This particular scene is quite gruesome, but very descriptive and paints a vivid image. He also uses figurative language throughout, such as, “But unlike thunder, this didn’t stop. It went on and on, machine-gun style, as if Zeus had loaded his bolts into an M60 with an inexhaustible ammo crate.”  There are scenes like this one throughout the book that are equally detailed, but all the actions in the book advance the plot in some way. Mullin doesn’t leave us waiting around, because if he did, we might get stuck in the ash.
            The piece is obviously genre and not literary, but there is no doubt that the characters cannot be connected with. Mullin thinks a lot like Steinbeck in the sense that although things get really bad, good can come out of it. This is the book’s theme, and can be proven by one crucial event: Since Alex must go on a journey to find his family, he meets Darla, a girl who becomes his girlfriend and possibly more if the story continued. In this sense the book is cliché, the hero gets the girl. But if he didn’t get her at the end, I would’ve been mad.
            The piece is strong and makes you think because it is based on true science. There really is a supervolcano underneath Yellowstone, and although it’s unlikely, this could really happen. And that alone makes this a supervolcano of a book, and it deserves an A.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

When Alex met Nick

The books Ashfall and Everlost are quite different in terms of genre. Ashfall is dystopian fiction, while Everlost  is more magic realism. However, the main characters in both, Alex and Nick respectively, both could be considered epic heroes. They are similar because they both go on journeys. Alex goes on a journey through the ash to his family in Warren, Illinois, while Nick goes on a journey with his friend Allie to explore the land of Everlost. Also, while on their journeys, they meet ladies that they begin to like. Alex meets Darla, a simple farm girl who lives out in the fields trying to survive the ashfall. Nick meets Mary, a seemingly innocent lady who is the self-proclaimed Queen of Everlost (but really she's not). So beneath the ash, these characters are actually quite similar.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Blog Post 6

Books that are non-fiction should be a true story, because that is what non-fiction is. Although what David Shields did is fascinating, what he did in my opinion cannot be considered a book. He did accomplish his goal in obliterating conventions in his own "writing," but he has gone against everything that a book is. A book is a creation that came out of your mind, not a mis-match of other people's words. When Shields questions why music and movies do this, but books do, I believe it's because that's what makes books and writing unique.
As for whether or not it matters if it's a good story, I believe that the people who create good stories should simply call them fiction. Why is it such a big deal to them to lie? And why can the people who read it not simply appreciate them as a good work of fiction? Why must it be true in order to sell? People should let these books be fiction and the authors should as well.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Blog Post 5

I think the problem with teaching literary fiction is that there is already a preconceived notion of the book and the "right" opinion about the book already exists. In English, you're supposed to have your own opinion about a book, but "classics" don't allow this to happen. The people who teach the books already know what the "right" answer is. This is not the case with genre fiction. For example, people can have different opinions about The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and not be wrong. But if someone questions the greatness of The Great Gatsby, then you are shunned from the discussion. Basically, I feel like with classics the ideas are already there. I think it's important to form your own opinions about what you read and not simply buy in to what people have said for 50+ years.